Saturday, June 25, 2005

This Man is a Nattering Naybob


Paul Krugman allows us to introduce the new Blogger photo functionality by applying to become poster boy of the Nattering Naybobs with his most recent column. How did we know that "Krugsy" would eventually get around to shoveling some Downing Street dung? Here's just a taste. Enjoy.

In November 2002, Helen Thomas, the veteran White House correspondent, told an audience, "I have never covered a president who actually wanted to go to war" - but she made it clear that Mr. Bush was the exception. And she was right. Leading the nation wrongfully into war strikes at the heart of democracy. It would have been an unprecedented abuse of power even if the war hadn't turned into a military and moral quagmire. And we won't be able to get out of that quagmire until we face up to the reality of how we got in.

Quite a leap there. From the ironclad opinions of Helen Thomas spring accusations of the grossest of misconduct. And oh the temerity! To represent it without so much as a shred of proof! Krugman is an utterly despicable creature who abuses a serious academic reputation to suggest absolute untruths or advance red-herrings in every column he writes. Don't believe me? There's a reason why Don Lushkin publishes a Krugman Truth Squad column over at NRO.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Why I hate Real Baseball

Well, yeah, the Padres lost to LA last night. Gotta give em their props. Starting an outfield in which none of the hitters had averages above .200, the Dogs managed to steal a win from the first place Padres and halt their eight game tailspin.

But the day was a bad one for the Friars all the way around. First, it appears that the injury bug plaguing the Dodgers has now spread to the San Diego clubhouse. The Pads announced that starting catcher Ramon Hernandez and starting pitcher Adam Eaton would be going to the disabled list. Also, it is looking likely that starting first baseman Phil Nevin will miss more time (and possibly even land on the DL) due to a strained oblique muscle. Obliques are notoriously difficult injuries to manage and rehab.

Second, on a day when Padres manager Bruce Bochy finally received a two-year contract extension, he displayed some of the annoying skills which have lead me to nickname him The Tinkerer. Now don't get me wrong, I like Bochy and glad he was extended. But he does drive me crazy sometimes with curious late-inning moves.

Exhibit A: The 1998 Braves-Padres NLCS. With the Pads leading the series 3-1 and up 4-2 in the seventh inning of Game 5, it looked like San Diego was on the verge of closing out the Braves and advancing to the World Series. Then The Tinkerer decided to get clever. He brought ace Kevin Brown out of the bullpen on 2 days' rest rather than using fresh relievers like Trevor Hoffman who were accustomed to late inning insertions. What made the move all the more maddening was that Brown, who had been lights-out as a starter in postseason was slated to start Game 6. Using Brown in this situation meant that should a Game 6 be necessary, Brownie would be unavailable. He promptly came in, gave up a three-run jack to Michael Tucker, Atlanta won 7-6 and Game 6 became a necessity. I was horrified. San Diego ended up winning the series and advancing to the World Series thanks to a memorable Game 6 performance by Sterling Hitchcock. But the impetuous move by Bochy was foolish and potentially put the entire series in jeopardy.

Fast forward to last night. With the Dodgers leading 5-4 in the eighth, San Diego loaded the bases. With two outs and Dodger righthander Duaner Sanchez on the mound, The Tinkerer decided to pinch hit for reserve catcher Miguel Ojeda. Although Ojeda is a righty and has had a tough year at the plate, The Tinkerer seems to have forgotten a couple of game-winning HR's Miguel hit last year that caused Bochy to often use him as a late-inning pinch hitter. Nonetheless, Bochy decides to pinch-hit. Fine. Righthanded Xavier Nady, one of San Diego's most-prized young power hitters was sitting on the bench. Although the righty-righty matchup wasn't ideal, it seemed like the right place to use Nady (more on that in a moment). Instead, The Tinkerer called on left-handed Paul McAnulty who just earlier yesterday afternoon had arrived on a plane from AA Mobile. McAnulty lined to second. Rally over.

Are you kidding me?

Nothing against McAnulty. Nothing against playing lefty-righty percentages. But how about THESE percentages? I'm not sure what they are, but rookie hitters making their first Major League appearances probably don't have batting averages above .210. Just guessing here, but I'm pretty sure about that. I wonder what their batting averages look like in eighth inning, bases loaded, two-out, high pressure situations against division rivals? I'm willing to bet they are even lower. It seems to me rather logical that even though you traditionally play the lefty-righty matchup, that in this case it's better to go with the established major leaguer rather than the kid who is more focused on his stomach being in his throat than what Sanchez is throwing. I would have rather seen Bochy stick with Ojeda or bring Nady off the bench. The McAnulty call didn't lose the game for the Padres. The Damian Jackson error on a sure double-play and the Pads stranding 10 runners, including 7 in scoring position is what lost the game. But the eighth inning was an opportunity to overcome all of that and using McAnulty in that situation wasn't fair to the kid nor was it fair to the team.

As for Xavier Nady, he is apparently the 25th man on the Padres. Behind even newly-promoted Paul McAnulty. I don't get it. Before the season, Bochy and Padres GM Kevin Towers suggested that Nady would be used as a "super-sub" and had him shagging flies in the outfield as well as taking grounders at first, second and third base. Dave Roberts has missed time in CF. Phil Nevin has missed time at first. Sean Burroughs has not gotten it done offensively at third and Mark Loretta will be out until August at second. And yet Nady finds himself sitting while Miguel Ojeda gets starts in LF? Or Geoff Blum starts at third?

When he was drafted in 1999, the X Man was considered one of the top collegians in the country. As a Scott Boras client, he slid to the second round where the Padres selected him and inked him to a major league contract. He is what I would call a professional hitter. He has raked at every level in the minors but has been blocked by Nevin, Burroughs and Klesko for the last few years on the Padres. He's had mixed success at the major league level, but then again he doesn't get consistent playing time. Nonetheless, anytime the Pads enter trade negotiations other teams ask about Nady. But for some reason The Tinkerer won't play the kid. Maybe he's not that good. But give him a chance. Letting him atrophy on the bench has to be killing whatever confidence he has left. Although Burroughs plays a mean 3B, his inability to drive in runs is a major problem for this team. Since Nady is a natural 3B I would give him the job for awhile to see how he does. But I don't think The Tinkerer will. And if that's the case, you might as well trade Nady. /rant.

Why I hate Fantasy Baseball

Earlier this week, I gave a long-winded rundown on a couple of my fantasy league teams. Fresh+Jive, which is the team in the league with Paul has been battling injuries all year. Bonds, Berkman, Loretta, Perez, Javy Lopez, Beckett and Percival have all done DL stints. But despite all these injuries, I've managed to hang tough. As of this writing, I'm only 6 1/2 games out of first.

But just as it was starting to look like I was going to get healthy for the first time this season, the rest of the roster has now been laid-up. Backups to my backups are now hurt. Steve Finley went on the DL yesterday. Jim Edmonds is playing with a slightly cracked rib and the Cards are considering sending him to the DL. Paul Lo Duca bruised his toe and has 4 AB's this week. Robert Freel has yet to play this week.

I'd make a roster move, but I can't jettison these guys. They are just too valuable. Looks like I'm just going to have to endure it and hope I don't lose too many categories.

What We Are Dealing With, Part 4

Our Allies in Europe can always be counted upon for a few yuks (and generally little else). But it's all fun and games until it's not fun and games anymore. And such is the case this morning when US News & World Report tells us that some European liberals are funding Iraqi insurgents. Nice.

These are clearly fringe extremists and anti-corporate radicals. And while that's fine as far as it goes, isn't funding such a deadly resistance antithetical (and therefore hypocritical) to the values espoused by these groups? Just a thought.

Ownage

With Paul living the easy life in Cali, I guess that puts the "Honus" on me. It's my sandbox for a bit and I'll try to keep the standards high. Well...relatively high.

We'll soon be reaching a cruising altitude of 25K feet. I'd like to remind all of those on board to NOT put their seats in the reclined or even semi-reclined position to protect the kneecaps and sanity of those sitting behind them. Those passengers with long legs (like your captain) will appreciate it. I'd also like to ask all onboard personnel to not bang their drink carts into those elbows which may actually be using the arm rests on the aisles. Flight attendants are also reminded to be courteous and prompt in collecting empty trays as it is quite possible that someone will need to use the restroom but be unable to get up until said trays are removed. I will soon be turning on the no crying or screaming light, so I'd ask all infants and small children to pipe the f*#& down. And finally, I would like to ask that everyone keep their shoes on. While no one believes that THEIR feet stink, they do. Trust me.

And with that bit of housekeeping done, I'd invite all of our passengers to lean back and enjoy the uncomfortable and annoying duration of our flight. We promise to wake you just as soon as you fall asleep.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

California Dreaming

Leaving for the California Coast in fairly short order. Rest assured that you are in good hands with the Simian Logician. He is a fine and able captain, more than capable of guiding you through the weekend in my absence.

But, should you experience any unexpected turbulence be sure to fasten your seat belt and return your tray to it's upright position!

The War is over, and We won

So blares the headline of this piece by Karl Zinsmeister appearing in The American Enterprise. At first glance, such seems out-of-place given what else we see and hear reported about Iraq here in the early summer of 2005.

Zinsmeister's thesis is actually pretty simple and straight-forward: Your editor returned to Iraq in April and May of 2005 for another embedded period of reporting. I could immediately see improvements compared to my earlier extended tours during 2003 and 2004. The Iraqi security forces, for example, are vastly more competent, and in some cases quite inspiring. Baghdad is now choked with traffic. Cell phones have spread like wildfire. And satellite TV dishes sprout from even the most humble mud hovels in the countryside.

Many of the soldiers I spent time with during this spring had also been deployed during the initial invasion back in 2003. Almost universally they talked to me about how much change they could see in the country. They noted progress in the attitudes of the people, in the condition of important infrastructure, in security.

In otherwords, things are better when the mundane things of life are in full bloom. After all, do people really worry about satellite TV, cell phones and the like when their lives are in direct danger?

I used to argue this with the usual suspects vis-a-vis the insurgency and the security situation in Iraq. I wonder still whether it provides a reliable metric by which you can measure the situation. Zinsmeister, however, does not:

What the establishment media covering Iraq have utterly failed to make clear today is this central reality: With the exception of periodic flare-ups in isolated corners, our struggle in Iraq as warfare is over. Egregious acts of terror will continue—in Iraq as in many other parts of the world. But there is now no chance whatever of the U.S. losing this critical guerilla war.

Contrary to the impression given by most newspaper headlines, the United States has won the day in Iraq. In 2004, our military fought fierce battles in Najaf, Fallujah, and Sadr City. Many thousands of terrorists were killed, with comparatively little collateral damage. As examples of the very hardest sorts of urban combat, these will go down in history as smashing U.S. victories.

And our successes at urban combat (which, scandalously, are mostly untold stories in the U.S.) made it crystal clear to both the terrorists and the millions of moderate Iraqis that the insurgents simply cannot win against today’s U.S. Army and Marines. That’s why everyday citizens have surged into politics instead.


Zinsmeister acknowledges the obvious about what he terms terrorist attacks, but makes a firm statement about the eventual outcome--in spite of the insurgents: The terrorist struggle has hardly ended. Even a very small number of vicious men operating in secret will find opportunities to blow up outdoor markets and public buildings, assassinate prominent political figures, and knock down office towers. But public opinion is not on the insurgents’ side, and the battle of Iraq is no longer one of war fighting—but of policing and politics.

On that, I believe, he is 100% correct. The January elections served to repudiate the insurgents and their philosophy, such as it is. With no political position put forth, the jihadi's could not claim any sort of legitimacy in the political process. That the elections occurred without major disruptions and with reasonably high turnout points to the population's desire for political solutions. Further proof is seen in recent agreements aimed at more involvement in the political process for the Sunni's.

Austin Bay recently made similar observations upon his recent return to Iraq (though with the honest caveat that recognizes the realistic ongoing threat): Last year, Haifa Street was a combat zone where US and Iraqi security forces showed up in Robo-Cop garb -- helmets, armor, Bradleys, armored Humvees. Horst told me that he and his Iraqi counterpart now have tea in a sidewalk cafe along the once notorious boulevard. Of course, Abu Musab al Zarqawi's suicide bombers haunt this fragile calm.

Is the mundane an accurate measurement of progress in Iraq? Difficult to say with any certainty, but I believe there is merit to the idea. After all, if I'm in mortal fear for my life am I going to run out and buy up the latest luxury?

Housing schizophrenia

Every week I'm treated to a new story about how out-of-control the area's housing market is, and how we should all be concerned about the frantically unrestrained housing bubble that will burst, leaving us all penniless...or something like that.

The latest buzz has included discussions about how homes are appreciating month-to-month at rates equal to last decade's annual appreciation. Woe is us!

Well, today comes this. Signs that things are leveling off:

Home sellers counting on the bidding wars and quick deals that have been driving Phoenix's housing market this year could be disappointed in the months ahead.

There are early signs the Valley's biggest home price gains have already played out during this boom, and now home sales and prices are approaching a peak.

And all this time we're supposed to have been worrying over the mad pace of home sales in the market and how it was going to ruin us?

"This housing bubble will not explode. It will just deflate," said Elliott Pollack, an Arizona economist and realty investor.

Yes, and as the article points out right before Mr. Pollack drops his wisdom-bomb: But real estate analysts don't expect home prices or values to drop, just to flatten out or increase much more slowly. Home sales remain on a record pace, and the number of houses for sale are half of what they were a year ago.

Kind of what I've been saying all along...how come they never call to quote me?

"Dissension is not unpatriotic"

So says Carlos--a self-identified military veteran--from Phoenix:

Regarding the Monday letter "Dems' Bush-bashing is out of control": I will hold my opinions on the issues of the Democrats. But as a veteran who served in Iraq twice, I feel the need to fix some preconceptions that Republican activists seem to have. Why do you people persist in thinking that dissension is somehow demoralizing the troops? What kind of warped view of war do you have?

Do you think we read the newspapers while firing our weapons? Do you think we read blogs while driving our vehicles? War is horrible and harsh and yet the first people to glorify it are people who are too cowardly to fight it themselves. Before you pretend to "speak" for the troops and before you say that Democratic criticism is demoralizing to us, you might want to go to boot camp and serve.

Carlos raises an interesting point, in that the default assumption on the Right vis-a-vis the attacks on the Iraq effort and those undertaking it play on the minds of the troops, thus contributing to an erosion of morale. Perhaps in that regard the Left is not the only group stuck in an unchanging Vietnam-paradigm.

With all due respect however to Carlos and his service, he does his basic argument a huge disservice when he insinuates that those who support going to war with Iraq "glorify" war and do so as cowards, afraid to enlist and put their bravado where their mouth is. That's an old argument, one that is more interested in shutting down discussion than making any point in particular:

The central implication here is that only men who have professionally endured war have the moral standing and the experiential authority to advocate war. That is, in this country at least, a radical and ahistorical view. The Founders, who knew quite well the dangers of a military class supreme, were clear in their conviction that the judgment of professional warmakers must be subjugated to the command of ignorant amateurs--civilian leaders who were in turn subjugated to the command of civilian voters.

Again, with all due respect to you and your two tours of duty in Iraq, Republicans, Democrats and Independents are entitled to support a war effort whose aims they agree with, as 229 years of US history shows.

Republicans, Democrats and Independents who oppose the war effort are, likewise, entitled to their dissent. The problem as I see it comes when you try to understand the motives behind such dissent. I would put it this way, in an echo of Dennis Prager's thoughts on the subject (and as I think the letter in question tried to address it):

Do the critics oppose Bush because they oppose the war, or do they oppose the war because they oppose Bush? A question worth asking.

As Sim has said before, "The unexamined life is not worth living."

Downing Street....as if we needed more....

Christopher Hitchens weighs-in. Not much new here, although his insight on the Brits' usage of the term "fixed" and his catch on MI6's reference to the "Sunni majority" are helpful. Really just posting to show that there's a real unanimity on DSM among those with brains. Moneyquote:

I am now forced to wonder: Who is there who does not know that the Bush administration decided after September 2001 to change the balance of power in the region and to enforce the Iraq Liberation Act, passed unanimously by the Senate in 1998, which made it overt American policy to change the government of Iraq? This was a fairly open conspiracy, and an open secret. Given that everyone from Hans Blix to Jacques Chirac believed that Saddam was hiding weapons from inspectors, it made legal sense to advance this case under the banner of international law and to treat Saddam "as if" (and how else?) his strategy of concealment and deception were prima facie proof. The British attorney general—who has no jurisdiction in these 50 states—was worried that "regime change" alone would not be a sufficient legal basis. One appreciates his concern. But the existence of the Saddam regime was itself a defiance of all known international laws, and we had before us the consequences of previous failures to act, in Bosnia and Rwanda, where action would have been another word for "regime change."

Vacuous Idiot Alert

Yes, you guessed right! Howard Dean is talking again.

The second day of Summer

Yesterday's Summer solstice brought us an official high in the neighborhood of 112 degrees. At 10:30 when we were finally going to bed, it was still 101.

Today? It's 9:05 A.M. and it's already over 100 at the airport, from which they take the official city-high. It's supposed to top out somewhere around 115 today. If we survive it, we leave this evening for 4 days on the California coast.

Oy...

Of 8, 2's and 6 1/2

Game 2 of the Padres' four game series with division rival Los Angeles resulted in a 2-1 victory for the good guys last night at Petco Park. But yesterday marked more than just a win for the Friars, it was a day which might have signalled a turning point in the NL West race represented symbolically by some key numbers.

Let's start with eight. Last night's loss was the eighth straight for a reeling Dodger club that is desperately seeking a leader to help right the ship. While I do expect LA to rebound at some point, no one on that club is getting it done right now.

Then there is the matter of the terrible twos. That I'm posting this on June 22 should give you a sense for how ominous the number two is in Dodgerland at the moment. Bad news preceded last night's game when it was learned that two of LA's players would miss the remainder of the season due to injury. The loss of Eric Gagne is a crippling blow for the Dodgers in a couple of ways. First, it will be very difficult for LA to overcome the loss of a truly dominant closer and arguably its best player. This does not bode well for 2005 divisional or playoff aspirations. Second, this will be Gagne's second Tommy John surgery. For the 29 year old reliever who makes his living throwing the hottest of heat, this is potentially career-threatening. He is not expected back on a mound until the All-Star break of 2006. While TJ surgeries have become far easier to rehab in recent years, having two of them on the same arm doesn't bode well for pitchers. In any case, here's hoping for a speedy recovery for Gagne. But back to the twos. In losing the second game of the series and two straight to the Pads by yielding two runs, LA has lost both games by a combined total of two runs. The twos were indeed terrible for the Dogs in America's Finest City yesterday.

And then there is the 6 1/2 game lead the Padres opened up on LA with last night's win. While it isn't a commanding lead (4 1/2 ahead of Arizona), without some sort of major re-tooling and righting of the ship, it may be lights-out for LA. Right now, San Diego is playing with out All-Star 2B Mark Loretta and All-Star C Ramon Hernandez. Dodger-killer Adam Eaton is missing two turns in the rotation with a finger strain. Once those guys get healthy, I think it's going to be awfully tough for LA to get back into this thing. Milton Bradley will help, but right now it doesn't look good.

Overall in the NL West, SF continues to limp along without Barry Bonds and with a Jason Schmidt who is only topping out around 92 mph on the gun. They are rumored to be sellers in the trade market with an eye toward moving Alfonzo and Durham. Arizona continues to hang around and could make some moves at the deadline which address their bullpen and starting rotation. Right now, Arizona doesn't really frighten me. But things could change if they make some moves.

Provided my guys stay healthy, I think they can win the division. But to do anything beyond that is going to require another bat. Personally, I think Sean Burroughs has had his shot and probably would benefit from a change of scenery. He plays stellar defense and is hitting around .290 but the Padres need more punch than the 10 RBI and 4 extra-base hits he has on the season. Aubrey Huff is rumored to be available, and I'd like that move because of his positional flexibility. He can play 1B, 3B and LF. And as Nevin, Klesko and Burroughs depart the scene over the next couple of seasons it would be nice to plug Huff in one of those slots. But I doubt John Moores will be eager to take on that kind of salary.

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Shock & Awwww

Drafting on my own post from this morning, the bad news for the Dodgers just got worse. All-Star reliever Eric Gagne will miss the remainder of the season due to Tommy John surgery. It will be the second such surgery for the 29 year old pitcher. According to Vin Scully, reserve catcher Paul Bako will also be sidelined for the season due to an ACL injury.

I don't wish injuries on anyone, but these setbacks definitely aren't good news for the playoff aspirations of a team already mired in a seven game death spiral.

Durbin apologizes

As reported by the Blogfather in his first-hour open. Details when the write-ups start.

3:29 P.M.

Here is the AP write-up.

4:03 P.M.

Reaction starts coming in. This from a pastor; my own thoughts began drifting in the same general direction once I heard/read the entire statement:

"As you know I'm a pastor, which means I spend a lot of time talking about repentance and forgiveness. I also listen to people confess and repent. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't hear Senator Durbin admit he had actually done anything wrong, only that he was sorry 'some were offended.' Which is another form of his previous statement, that he was sorry he was misunderstood, which is not the same as an admission of guilt, but an admission of unintended consequences. Again, am I wrong, did I miss something, or is he equivocating with tears this time?"

Getting 'caught' always makes one sorry. Saying that you're sorry that someone got offended doesn't even address what you actually did.

Just do it!

From a Washington Post report: The Senate on Monday refused for a second time to confirm John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, prompting his supporters to urge President Bush to bypass Congress and give the controversial nominee a recess appointment, which would last 18 months.

I for one say, just do it. Enough is enough. The Senate Democrats have hemmed and hawed, whined and cried about this nomination for months. They've had hearings; they delayed committee votes twice and once the nomination got to the floor, they've defeated cloture twice.

Enough. When it isn't even about the nominee anymore, how long do you let this kind of behavior go on?

Democrats said the issue is no longer Mr. Bolton, but an institutional fight with the administration over access to names from foreign communications intercepts, which Democrats want to see to determine whether Mr. Bolton was trying to bully analysts. Democrats said that as long as the information and materials on a speech on Syria's weapons program are not provided, they will block Mr. Bolton.

At the risk of seeming an unconcerned hyper-partisan, I strongly urge the President to make the recess appointment. After urging the Senate to do it's job for months, he is entitled to exercise his executive prerogative. And who knows, maybe a thumb in the eye will bring the Dems back to their senses.

Actually, make that a finger. I think you know which one.

Far-Wrong

Steve Benson, in a demonstration of just how influential blogging can be, is becoming a hot topic around town.

James in Chandler, for one, says "Enough is enough!":

Cartoonist Steve Benson is out of control!

Using the medical results of the vegetative state of an individual to make one of his far-left comments in last Friday's cartoon is over the line.

Obviously, you have no minimum standards for basic human behavior. It is also obvious there is no review of his work. I love Benson, but he cannot yell "fire" in a crowded theater.

I didn't bother with it because, a) I hate giving this guy publicity of any sort or size. He doesn't deserve it; he's just not that good, and b) it was a disgustingly rabid attack. I begrudge no one their views of those they disagree with politically, but I do draw a line. One that cartoon crossed over.

Robert in Phoenix disagrees. To each their own I guess.

"Show me the Euros!"

The Times of London blasts the Euro's for their lack of follow-through in delivering pledged aid. 20-months ago, world leaders convened in Madrid and pledged billions of dollars in aid to assist the reconstruction efforts in Iraq. What have we seen in the interim?

Since then less than a third of that money has been spent and much of the European funding has not even been delivered to holding accounts set up by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. But Iraq's reliance on outside help, if it is to bring peace and security to its people, remains acute. The conference of international donors starting in Brussels tomorrow must be seized on, especially by Europe, to send a signal of unshakeable support for the Iraqi people, and of equally unshakeable resolve to help to defeat those intent on destroying their nascent democracy.

While acknowledging that the on-going security issues make work in Iraq difficult, the Times refuses to let anyone off the hook: The most obvious reason for governments' failure to deliver on pledges made at the Madrid conference is Iraq's bleak security situation. Clearly, aid agencies and contractors cannot be expected to deploy civilian personnel where their safety cannot be guaranteed. But there is a difference between reasonable caution and willful neglect. The decisions by France, Germany and Russia to ignore Iraq's pleas out of political pique were indefensible in Madrid and would be unforgivable if repeated in Brussels.

Europe is flirting with irrelevance here, given the unfulfilled promises it's made. In their quest to be taken seriously on a world-stage dominated by the U.S., such actions make them look like great pretenders. Nobody wants to entrust a room full of pretenders with any real authority or responsibility, and wisely so. It's time to step-up; put your Euros where your mouths are!

The Life Electra-Glide

Reserve Colonel Austin Bay--also noted author and blogger--has a piece reproduced at Real Clear Politics this morning. A sober assessment from a man who has done two tours in Iraq, is a keenly intelligent military mind and brings much to bear on the question of progress in Iraq.

This return visit to Iraq, however, spurs thoughts of America -- to be specific, thoughts about America's will to pursue victory. I don't mean the will of US forces in the field. Wander around with a bunch of Marines for a half hour, spend 15 minutes with National Guardsmen from Idaho, and you will have no doubts about American military capabilities or the troops' will to win.

But our weakness is back home, in front of the TV, on the cable squawk shows, on the editorial page of The New York Times, in the political gotcha games of Washington, D.C.

It seems America wants to get on with its Electra-Glide life, that Sept. 10 sense of freedom and security, without finishing the job. The military is fighting, the Iraqi people are fighting, but where is the US political class?

Yes indeed. Some of them are too busy pitching excrement from their cages; others are standing up to applaud them. Yet more of them are planted firmly in front of the door with their arms crossed, refusing to get out of progress' way; yet more are telling us all is lost. Others are more concerned with personal survival.

Way to drop the ball guys!

The multifacted world of Gitmo "torture."

With the perpetual media drumbeat about American human rights abuses in its detention facilities providing yahoos like Dick Durbin and Amnesty International platforms to irresponsibly mischaracterize the realities of what is happening in the "American Gulag", it is important that we try to maintain some perspective on the treatment of prisoners.

While I am deeply troubled by the Administration's mucking-around in the shadowy periphery of torture, let us also be clear that it is the periphery. That is not to absolve it of responsibility, but there is also the matter of scale. Yes, there have been murders, rapes, renditions, ghost detainees, etc. But it is not clear that these abuses are systematic or widespread. That there is not more transparency, and therefore certainty about the scale, is nonethless of serious concern. But let us also be clear that we are not talking about Auschwitz or the Khmer Rouge's Killing Fields. Nor are we talking about anything on the order of this week's buzzword, Soviet gulags. But the unfortunate grandstanding of Durbin and Amnesty by making comparisons has actually deflected attention from the real problems and taken the heat off of the Bush Administration. Remember, while we aren't talking about gulags, we are talking about an issue which needs to be urgently addressed by the Administration with full transparency, strengthened operating modalities and a re-commitment to American values and international standards.

That said, a brief review of a recent menu at Gitmo should make it quite clear that these detainees are not comparable to those cited in the historical examples above. California Congressman Duncan Hunter (who isn't my favorite, but he makes a good point here) recently described the June 12 Gitmo menu to FoxNews:

"For Sunday they're going to be having Orange Glazed Chicken, Fresh Fruit Roupee, Steamed Peas and Mushrooms, Rice Pilaf - we treat them very well," he told Fox. Last night, Hunter said, the U.S. "torture victims" enjoyed the same kind of gourmet fare, including an entree of "Lemon-baked Fish." On the other hand, feeding the detainees MREs, the standard fare given to our troops on the front lines, is strictly verboten - considered an "abuse" under restrictions imposed by Congress, Hunter said. The top House Republican also noted that the religious practices of the terrorist suspects held at the U.S. "gulag" are scrupulously accommodated, explaining: "We give them honey and dates when they break fast at Ramadan. We give them prayer beads and prayer oil - all paid for [by the U.S. taxpayer.] "In fact," he said, "if you did that for American GIs - if you had a call to prayer five times a day - the ACLU would sue on the basis that we violated the separation between church and state."

Again, this doesn't excuse ANY violation committed by the United States, but I think it's important that we try to maintain a little perspective as we are deluged with prisoner abuse stories. However, if you would like to prepare some of those yummy Gitmo delicacies at home, you can order the cookbook here.

DSM for Dummies

Daniel Drezner is rapidly approaching Blog-hero status with me. An economist by trade, he demonstrates a rare ability to synthesize (and link) various perspectives and impart his analysis in a very concise, stripped-down manner. How does he do it? Amazing. This is the guy to watch and learn from.

Yesterday he essentially captured all of the key points about the Downing Street Memo dust-up in a very clear, minimalistic, link and analysis-packed post. Kudos.

Gravity Strikes Bums

The essential truism of the Law of Gravity is that what goes up, must come down. But for some baseball teams it happens more quickly than for others.

Exhibit A is the Los Angeles Dodgers, referred to rather presciently by this observer earlier this season as The Trolley Wreck. Of course that moniker didn't look so appropriate when they were the hottest team in baseball, getting out of the blocks to a 12-2 start. But as the season has progressed it's taken on the ring of truth. It's now clear that they were doing it with mirrors through the efforts of legends like Derek Lowe and Jose Valentin. Spring has now given way to summer and as Lowe's star as dimmed, Valentin finds himself joined by Milton Bradley and Eric Gagne (again) on the DL and Vin Scully is singing the praises of household names like Erickson (Scott. You know, the guy who came up in 1990? Who has 125 K's in five years?), Choi, Repko, Werth, Grabowski and Saenz. Since the 12-2 start, the Dogs are 21-34 and after last night's loss to the Padres, losers of seven straight. Even more troubling is that as division-leading San Diego has followed May's unconsciousness by listing to a 6-12 start to June, they have actually gained a half game on LA.

To be fair, the Dogs are only 5 games off the pace in a mediocre division and they've had injury problems. Save-machine and goofy-looking Gagne hasn't been healthy all season and depending upon the outcome of some testing may be lost for the year. Odalis Perez hasn't pitched in a month and the progress shown by Milton Bradley has been tempered by his injury issues. Those are tough losses to overcome.

But the larger question is who is the star on this team that's going to help turn the tide and carry it? Brad Penny has pitched well and was very good last night, but hasn't emerged into a dominant starter and his career has been plagued by injuries. Jeff Kent has had an outstanding season and goes through streaks where he gets ridiculously hot, but follows them just as surely with nuclear winter streaks. J.D. Drew is a perpetual enigma. The possibility of no Gagne raises serious questions about the bullpen, which is populated with talented but inexperienced arms. While some deadline dealing may prove an elixir for LA's woes, the truth of the matter is that they don't have much ammo and there are simply too many holes to fill. Moreover, the upper levels of the farm system are barren, thus providing little prospect for immediate help via promotion or fodder for race-altering trades. For example, former top pitching prospect Edwin Jackson has regressed and was recently demoted.

So for the moment, Trolley Wreck it is. While a healthy Bradley and Perez will definitely elevate the level of play, I don't see much hope for LA this season.

Why I hate fantasy baseball, but love it too.

Paul's written several missives about his hatred for the fantasy baseball racket which regularly provides those who play great consternation. I share his frustrations, but I diversify my portfolio by playing in several leagues. Thus, when one club is struggling due to buffoonery or circumstances beyond my control, another may be riding high. And such is the case in two of the, yes, seven leagues I am engaged in.

For example in the league I am playing in with Paul, my season has been very frustrating. I had a pretty good draft and made a quality trade with Paul before the season to bolster the lineup. But Barry Bonds hasn't played a lick this season, Mark Loretta has been out for an extended period and has been replaced by Robert Freel's occassional play and 9 RBI. Javy Lopez will also miss a good chunk of the season. And Lance Berkman, who started the season on the DL as a result of ACL surgery has yet to really do anything since returning to the lineup except play enough games at 1B to make him eligible at two positions now. Whoop-de-do Basil! And while my pitching staff has been brilliant, it suffered a setback a month ago when Odalis Perez joined the injury parade. He still isn't back pitching, but last week Josh Beckett joined him on the DL with this ridiculous and recurring finger blister problem that shelves him from time to time.

But, hope springs eternal for my Fresh+Jive squad. Last week I was able to bolster my already-strong pitching with a trade for Freddy Garcia. He'll help pick up the slack for the Beckett-Perez problem. The other good news is that somehow I managed to find both Todd Helton and Scott Rolen on the waiver wire. Now Helton is off to a very slow start and has no one to protect him in a weak Colorado lineup, but it is hard to imagine him hitting in the .250s all year. Rolen has spent the majority of the year on the DL, but again it is hard to imagine him not regaining his All-Star power form. And even though I'm already set at 1B and 3B, these guys were worth a gamble and could make for nice trade fodder down the line. One of the keys in fantasy baseball is to play for the long haul, and while I'm currently sitting in eighth place (out of ten), I'm only 7.5 games off the pace in a pretty competitive league.

But I mentioned another league, too. In that one, I have been in first place since the get-go. Nate Colbert's Twinbill has been pretty dominant, sporting a 70% winning percentage and leading the second place club by a mere 19 games.

But in that league I've also been faced with a little bit of a dilemma. The hitting on my club has been truly electrifying, with Bobby Abreu, Melvin Mora, Richie Sexson, Brian Roberts, Pat Burrell, Troy Glaus and Carlos Delgado playing lights-out. But I've been forced to slowly whittle-away at my bench because top-of-the-line starting pitching keeps hitting the waiver wire. I started out with Mark Prior, Ben Sheets, Curt Schilling, Livan Hernandez and Rich Harden as my starting five. Not too shabby. But through waivers, I have since added Javier Vasquez and John Garland who are off to fine starts and have helped me overcome the lengthy DL stints of Sheets, Schilling, Harden and now Prior. Eventually, they will come back and pitch, but my question was always "Who to cut when the time comes?" Well, that problem just got a little bit tougher when I was forced to add Kerry Wood yesterday. A former All-Star, Wood's also injured and is injury-prone, but he's on a minor league rehab assignment and should return next week. So just in case you are counting, I currently employ six starters who have appeared in the All-Star game, one who will surely make it this year (Garland) and one who will almost certainly make one in his career (Harden).

Of course four of them are currently on the DL. But again, you take risks on quality players, and endure some production shortfalls to hopefully reap the rewards in the second half. Those rewards could come in the form of elevated production and/or trade returns. But of course, this is also a situation where a 19 game lead makes such gambles possible.

Interesting stuff. At least to me ;-)

One Thing The Dodgers Don't Have...

is anyone on their roster to match young Jake Peavy. The Padres 24-year old Cy Young candidate was masterful in shutting down the Dodgers last night, allowing only two hits and no runs over eight innings as the Friars claimed a 1-0 victory. He finished with a career high 13 strikeouts. At one point Peavy fanned eight of nine hitters. That's dealing!

And Peavy's performance could not have been any more clutch. With the Padres lurching to a 5-12 start in June mainly against AL Central opponents, Peavy kicked off a return to divisional play with the kind of performance that true number one starters deliver. About having his turn in the rotation staggered a day to position him to start against the hated Dogs, he told the San Diego Union-Tribune:

"It fired me up that they wanted me to face L.A.," the 24-year-old ace said after ending a three-game winless skid. "I wanted to face them."

That kind of confidence paired with nasty stuff yields dominant performances like the one we saw last night. In fact, the only time Peavy got into any real trouble was in the eighth inning after Phil Nevin's error allowed Hee Seop Choi to reach second base. With the tying run at second, Peavy induced a weak but troublesome grounder from Jayson Werth on which 3B Sean Burroughs made a tremendous play. Charging down the third base line, Burroughs simultaneously nabbed the ball, looked Choi back to second and fired a perfect strike to first to nail Werth. Peavy responded in kind by K'ing the next two Dodger hitters to end the threat and charged off the mound pumping his fist to the delight of 40, 000 Friar Faithful at Petco.

After enduring a debilitating upper respiratory infection a couple of weeks ago which caused Peavy to lose about 10 pounds, the young hurler had battled through a couple of lackluster outings. But in last night's big game against a division rival, Peavy clearly regained his form. Despite struggling through the health issues, last season's NL ERA champ now finds himself sitting at 6-2 and sporting a 2.56 ERA for 2005. He's also nipping at the heels of New York's Pedro Martinez in the strikeout race, trailing Martinez 114-107. And to top it all off, he seems like a really great kid. If he continues to pitch like he has thus far in 2005 it is hard to imagine a Bonds-less San Francisco or a rather pedestrian Dodger club besting the Padres in the lackluster NL West.

Monday, June 20, 2005

For those who would confuse the issue

on who's who in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, check this.

Recess appointment

Senate Democrats have blocked another attempt to bring the Bolton nomination to the floor for a vote today.

Condi Rice was hinting that a recess appointment might be coming should the Dem's keep Bolton bottled up in the Senate.

Pros, Cons. Thoughts?

Stuff you can't make up

A Florida man was killed as a result of a road-rage incident early yesterday morning. Apparently he and another driver exchanged words in a parking lot before getting in their cars and pulled off the road to continue their argument. One thing led to another and one of the men struck the other, knocking him out into traffic:

At the intersection of State Road 7 and Griffin Road in Davie, both men got out of their cars and began fighting. Roqueta was punched in the face, knocking him into northbound traffic, Bamford said.

Police said Roqueta was killed instantly, and the driver of the vehicle that stuck[sic] him never stopped.

Unfortunate and sad. At the risk of seeming a boor in discussing this poor man's fate, I point you to the root of the argument:

Roqueta became involved in a heated dispute around 4 a.m. with another man over Roqueta's souped-up Dodge Neon in the parking lot of the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood, police said.

A short week

I'm glad to see that Sim has found his laptop again. I was beginning to wonder if he'd lost it somewhere between the Pixies concert and the after-show libations.

Given that we will be making our annual pilgrimage back to my wife's home-town, it's good to know that somebody will be here posting. Even just a little bit...not to put any pressure on you, but I'll be gone Thursday through Sunday. The place is yours for four days...don't disappoint (we'll discuss extending your contract when I get back)!

As an aside, my wife was once a servant to the Queen!

Zinger, II.

VDH is en fuego. This book review and subsequent analysis of UN failings is spot-on. The only comment I would make is that rather than pronouncing the entire institution a colossal failure, it would be preferable for Mr. Hanson to pronounce its efforts in the security realm colossal failures. The UN generally does a tremendous job on social, economic and humanitarian fronts. While it often stumbles for many of the same reasons Hanson references in his review, the record is far more solid in non-security missions. Of course, Hanson's point is well-taken when one considers that the UN's raison-d'etre is the provision of collective security. One need only read the final transcript of delegates at the final meeting of the League of Nations to understand this. (I'm looking for a link, but it's pretty difficult to track down.)

What is real torture?

This is the difference between real torture and the characterizations of things such as Abu Ghraib and Gitmo. It's copied here in it's entirety because it deserves reading:

Marines on an operation to eliminate insurgents that began Friday broke through the outside wall of a building in this small rural village to find a torture center equipped with electric wires, a noose, handcuffs, a 574-page jihad manual - and four beaten and shackled Iraqis.

The American military has found torture houses after invading towns heavily populated by insurgents - like Falluja, where the anti-insurgent assault last fall uncovered almost 20 such sites. But rarely have they come across victims who have lived to tell the tale.

The men said they told the marines, from Company K, Third Marines, Second Division, that they had been tortured with shocks and flogged with a strip of rubber for more than two weeks, unseen behind the windows of black glass. One of them, Ahmed Isa Fathil, 19, a former member of the new Iraqi Army, said he had been held and tortured there for 22 days. All the while, he said, his face was almost entirely taped over and his hands were cuffed.

In an interview with an embedded reporter just hours after he was freed, he said he had never seen the faces of his captors, who occasionally whispered at him, "We will kill you." He said they did not question him, and he did not know what they wanted. Nor did he ever expect to be released.

"They kill somebody every day," said Mr. Fathil, whose hands were so swollen he could not open a can of Coke offered to him by a marine. "They've killed a lot of people."

From the house on Saturday, there could be heard sounds of fighting from the large-scale offensive to eliminate strongholds of insurgents, many of whom stream across Iraq's porous border with Syria. [Page 10.]

As the marines walked through the house - a squat one-story building of sand-colored brick - the broken black window glass crunched under their boots. Light poured in, revealing walls and ceiling shredded by shrapnel from the blast they had set off to break in through a wall. Latex gloves were strewn on the floor. A kerosene lantern lay on its side, shattered.

The manual recovered - a fat, well-thumbed Arabic paperback - listed itself as the 2005 First Edition of "The Principles of Jihadist Philosophy," by Abdel Rahman al-Ali. Its chapters included "How to Select the Best Hostage," and "The Legitimacy of Cutting the Infidels' Heads."

Also recovered were several fake passports, a black hood, the painkiller Percoset, handcuffs and an explosives how-to-guide. Three cars loaded with explosives were parked in a garage outside the house. The marines blew them up.

This is Mr. Fathil's account of his ordeal.

He was having a lunch of lettuce and cucumbers in the kitchen of his home in the small desert village of Rabot with his mother and brother. An Opel sedan pulled up. Two men in masks carrying machine guns got out, seized him, and, leaving his mother sobbing, put him in the trunk of their car.

The drove to the house here. They taped his face, put cotton in his ears, and began to beat him.

The only possible explanation for the seizure he could think of was his time in the new Iraqi Army. Unemployed and illiterate, Mr. Fathil signed up after the American occupation began.

But nine months ago, when continuing working meant risking the wrath of the Jihadists, he quit. In all, 10 friends from his unit have been killed, he said. So have his uncle and his uncle's son, though neither ever worked as soldiers.


The men tended to talk in whispers, he said, telling him five times a day, in low voices in his ear, to pray, and offering him sand, instead of water, to wash himself. Just once, he asked if he could see his mother, and one of them said to him, "You won't leave until you are dead."

Mr. Fathil did not know there were other hostages. He found out only after the captors left and he was able to remove the tape from his eyes.

The routine in the house was regular. Because of the windows, it was always dark inside. Mr. Fathil said he was fed once a day, and allowed to use a bathroom as necessary in the back of the house.

When marines burst in, one of the captives was lying under a stairwell, badly beaten. At first, they thought he was dead.

The others were emaciated and battered. Mr. Fathil had fared the best. The other three were taken by medical helicopter to Balad, a base near Baghdad with a hospital.

But he still had been hurt badly. Marks from beatings criss-crossed his back, and deep pocks, apparently from electric shock burns, were gouged in his skin.

The shocks, he said, felt "like my soul is being ripped out of my body." But when he would start to scream, and his body would pull up from the shock, they would begin to beat him, he said.

Mr. Fathil has been at the Marine base south of Qaim since his release, on Saturday around noon. His mother still does not know he is alive.


When she was mentioned, he bowed and lowered his head, and began to cry softly, wiping his face with the jumpsuit given him by the marines.

He asked a reporter for help to move to another town, because it was too dangerous for his family to remain in their house. He begged not to have a photograph taken, even of the scars on his back. The captors took pictures of that, he said.

His town has always been a good place, he said, but the militants have made it hell.

"These few are destroying it," he said, his face streaked with tears. "Everybody they take, they kill. It's on a daily basis pretty much."


Does it sound at all like what Senator Durbin described last week? The good senator would have been fine had he simply stared at the CSPAN camera and said he was uncomfortable with some of the things he was hearing about at Gitmo, like many were (and rightfully so) about the abuses at Abu Ghraib. His analogies to Nazi's, Pol Pot and Soviet gulags did nothing but expose his moral idiocy and open him to attack from anyone with a voice and some historical perspective.

He was wrong. Wrong in his understanding and wrong to open his mouth and make that clear to the rest of us.

Zinger.

I couldn't add anything to this even if I wanted to.

The constant? A global distrust of Western-style liberalism and preference for deductive absolutism. So burn down a mosque in Zimbabwe, murder innocent Palestinians in Bethlehem in 2002, arrest Christians in Saudi Arabia, or slaughter Africans in Dafur, and both the Western Left and the Middle East's hard Right won't say a word. No such violence resonates with America's diverse critics as much as a false story of a flushed Koran — precisely because the gripe is not about the lives of real people, but the psychological hurts, angst, and warped ideology of those who in their various ways don't like the United States. I will pass over quickly the day's other sorry stories, but they were equally revealing. From Karachi, we learn that Pakistani Shiite Muslims burned down a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise. You see, a Sunni suicide bomber had just blown up 19 Pakistani Shia. In reaction to that attack, the Shiite mob went out and killed six employees of a business owned and operated by a Pakistani Muslim. Follow the logic of the Middle East: When you are angry at your own for their murdering, and are too weak or terrified to do anything about it, go out and destroy anything remotely American-affiliated. I read the most of these news accounts last week while sitting in a Starbucks (Dunkin' Donuts next door) on the eastern side of the Brandenburg Gate in the former Communist sector of Berlin — watching a parade of protestors damn the militarism of the United States (a.k.a. "Top Gun") while a nearby TV blared accounts of a recent German mystery on state-run television, whose subtext was that the United States intelligence planned September 11 and blamed it on the poor jihadists. So there we have a snapshot of 60 years of American efforts to rid Germany of Hitler, pour in Marshall Plan money, keep 300 Soviet divisions out of Germany, and convince skeptical British, French, and Russians to support reunification: In response, welcome in American popular culture as you damn the United States in the conveniently abstract.

Talking Points Illustrated

Steve Benson has suddenly become a topic of discussion here. Frankly, I hate myself for it; he's not that important a cartoonist in the big scheme of things.

But I digress. He weighed in over the weekend with all his powers of reason on the Downing Street Meme-o. Enjoy!

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Governor goes back to the drawing board

Governor Napolitano called for a special session for the state legislature in the wake of her budget vetoes last month. The goal is to bring the legislature back to the table to work with the Governor on passing new bills in place of the ones she KO'd after her compromise with the Republican-majority lawmakers.

She unveiled the first of those replacement bills on Friday: Gov. Janet Napolitano offered a plan Friday to satisfy a federal court order by spending $185 million a year more on Arizona's growing number of students who struggle to learn English. The program would start with $13.5 million this school year but would grow to $185 million by 2009, or roughly $1,300 more for every student classified as an English-language learner.

It seems there is still a fair amount of acrimony left over from last month's unexpected breakdown of the budget deal. The Republican leadership had some unkind things to say after seeing the Governor's new proposal:

On Friday, Republicans quickly questioned the governor's proposal. House Speaker Jim Weiers wondered why the state should spend so much to educate non-English-speaking kids, many of whom he said are in the state illegally or have parents who are undocumented immigrants.

"Under the governor's program, this becomes Mexico's best school district north of the border," said Weiers, R-Phoenix. "There's more in this proposal than the entire funding for the Department of Public Safety. How ironic."

While the comments about 'Mexico's best school district' represent silly hyperbole, the point is still well taken. What was wrong with the version that legislators sent to the Governor's office last month? They still do not appear to believe the Governor's stated reasons for the veto and are adamant that there plan was, and is, better:

Weiers said the Legislature's plan was superior, not just less expensive, because it required schools to justify how much money they would need to tackle their English-learner problems. It also mandated that new money would be spent on English-immersion programs, not on bilingual instruction, a method that districts must obtain waivers to use after voters rejected it in 2000.

The Governor--30 days and counting--has yet to offer anything more than blanket statements about the vetoed bills. She appears to be standing by her previous statements that the versions she was sent were not what was promised.

As an observer of all this I am still struck by the Governor's silence on the key issue of what her office did and/or didn't know about the vetoed bills. The Republican leaders have made it specifically clear that the Governor's chief liaison, George Cunningham, was fully aware of what went into the final version of the vetoed bills and signed off on all of them without offering any indication that they were unacceptable to the Governor.

Meanwhile, Governor Napolitano has offered no specifics at all on this point, only insisting (in the case of the English-learner bill) that the finished product did not contain an agreed-upon provision. Republican leadership in the Assembly and Senate have denied that is the case, making the argument mentioned above of Cunningham's involvement in the process.

The Governor's unwillingness to even address the point leaves those of us on the outside wondering exactly what happened. In my case, my initial suspicion that she simply decided to take what she got and renig on the items she conceded remains. Barring explanation from the Governor's office, how does one eliminate the doubts?

The plan as envisioned by Governor Napolitano has supporters and critics both. Tim Hogan of the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest is a strong supporter of Napolitano's plan. He points to built-in accountability, an issue that critics in the legislature do not believe gets addressed adequately:

Weiers argued that Napolitano's plan lacks the accountability of the Legislature's proposal because it doesn't require schools to justify their spending on English learners until after they get the money. But Hogan said Napolitano's plan has rigorous accountability measures that "ensure that the money gets where it's needed."

As reported by the Republic, the Governor's plan would increase funding as well as addressing other issues:

Besides the added funding, here are some of the key elements of Napolitano's plan:

• The money would be put into a special, segregated fund that could be used only for English-language learners.

• There would be annual audits of how every dime was being spent and would require schools to report their academic progress for those students.

• The auditor general, who is a legislative watchdog, would develop a format for districts to detail how and why they were using the money.

In addition to the English-learner bill, Napolitano offered her version of the vetoed corporate-tuition tax credit. This represented the largest concession to Republican lawmakers in the original agreement as it was crucial in securing the Governor's target for full-funding of all-day Kindergarten.

The Republic article closes on a solemn note. On this issue, the Republican legislators are demanding that the Governor sign the original bill before they will even begin discussions on resolving the English-learner issue. Such does not bode well for a quiet, happy summer at the Capitol.

If I were Governor Napolitano, I'd take a long hard look in the mirror before I even ventured to ask the lawmaker's why they're willing to stonewall such a significant issue with a court-ordered deadline for resolution. She has lost their trust and I'm frankly not sure how she can win it back.

Friday, June 17, 2005

Reader slams Benson

And rightfully so, in my humble opinion. The Powerline guys were made aware of this cartoon when it was published and rightfully slammed him for it.

Duke in Avondale writes the Republic:

If you are going to continue to print Benson cartoons that are flat-out lies and distortions about Guantanamo Bay guards "desecrating" the Quran, then you must also publish the U.S. Army's guide to handling the Quran at Guantanamo Bay.

Next Thursday, print the guide side by side with Benson's cartoon and let your readers decide about Benson's honesty (maybe he's just flat-out ignorant) with this issue.

Steve Benson isn't ignorant, he is willfully biased. He has yet to produce a cartoon in the 3 1/2 years I've lived here that is anything but critical of the Bush Administration. It is obvious to anyone who sees his work on even a semi-regular basis that he is a critic of the Right and uses what platform he has to share that opinion.

On a side note, he's not much of a nice guy either. In December of last year I traded email with Mr. Benson regarding a cartoon he'd done about Bush's cabinet. His response was (what else?) a smushing together of talking points, all vague and general; but best of all it was snide and rather impolite:

Sure, they're yes men--and Bush controls his cabinet like he did his carefully-orchestrated campaign pep rallies. Admission by permission only.

He is insulated, isolated--and great cartoon material.

If only there wasn't a constitutional prohibition on consecutive presidential terms. He's a god-send for cartoonists.

As far as killing you, well, that is your problem, not mine.

Steve Benson is a talented cartoonist. Too bad he's a jerk to readers.

Long on Grandstanding

Short on, well...pretty much everything else. Even Dana Milbank can't put much of a positive spin on it.

I caught about 15 minutes on CSPAN last night while waiting for my wife to get home and playing catch with the dogs. I'm not sure which I found more sickening; the likes of Barbara Lee congratulating Joe Wilson, Ray McGovern and the rest of the 'witnesses' for their 'bravery' or watching McGovern turn it around and congratulate Lee, Maxine Waters, David Conyers, Charles Rangel et al. for their 'bravery'...presumably for speaking truth to power and all that.

"I think I'm gonna hurl!"

Rumor has it

The San Antonio Spurs are set to arrive today for games three, four and five in Detroit.

Oops.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

The tool gets hammered

Dick Durbin under assault on the floor of the Senate by his colleagues. He is also the focus of a blog swarm:

Froggy Ruminations asks "Illinois, Are You Going to Sit There and Let Your Senator Call Your Sons & Husbands Nazis?"

Bill Whittle writes at Eject! Eject! Eject!. His comments re: Durbin are the most illuminating of any I've heard or seen today:

Throughout the insurgency, and especially in places like Fallujah, enemy fighters with real or feigned wounds have called for aid. Not often does a soldier who has been in combat look down upon the wounded of either side without horror and sympathy. In places like Fallujah and Iwo Jima and Antietam it is an easy thing to see one's own reflection in that grimace and that agony.

So when a soldier out of uniform, who may have faked surrender to kill unsuspecting Americans, calls for aid and then willfully kills medics with a concealed grenade, where does that leave us? What unplumbed depths remain? When mercy is used as a weapon against the merciful, what horrors and abominations remain unplayed?


THAT, dear left-wing Citadels of Conscience, is what we are up against. That is what you support against the decency, honor and kindness you mock in your own countrymen as they build schools and hospitals and, indeed, an entire democracy. That is the definition of "Unlawful Combatant." It is not a legal nicety, and it is not a rhetorical flourish. It is a pattern of ruthlessness, deception and murder. And regardless of your motive, it is the side you find yourself taking.

These are the kind of men in Guantanamo. Who controls such men? And when busloads of men from Afghanistan and Syria and Jordan and Egypt and Iran, men without uniforms, men not under the control of any officer, men who follow no code of conduct other than an oath to kill any American, anywhere--who among us with a gram of understanding and perspective can be surprised when such men are hooded and shackled on air transports? And being left to sleep in the open air is one thing in Northern Germany in the winter of 44, and something else entirely in the middle of the goddam Caribbean! I mean, for the love of God, some of the people screaming themselves into a lather over such an outrage will pay tens of thousands of dollars for the same privilege a few miles away on a catamaran anchored off the coast of Jamaica.

And when people acting on the stage of their own moral outrage wonder when such men will be released, what do we say to them? When Osama bin Laden officially surrenders Al Qaeda on the deck of the USS Ronald Reagan? They have no government, they have no command structure, they have no objective but death. That is their great strength, and by God, it is also their weakness, and we would be fools--absolute drooling idiots--to let them have it both ways.

These fanatics have been rigorously coached to lie about mistreatment and torture, and despite this transparent fact, every utterance they make is breathlessly quoted and trumpeted by the press as absolute truth. The naked human pyramids, intimidation with dogs, sexual humiliation and threat of electroshock torture that marked a day or two of mistreatment at Abu Graib were the tools used by immature and untrained individuals precisely because the methods previously employed at that location--removal of fingers and tongues and genitalia, electrified wire brushes, and the rape and murder of relatives before the eyes of the prisoner-- are so far beyond the horizon of what American interrogators are able to imagine doing that any comparison between the two betrays the moral blindness of those making the comparison.

Is humiliation the same as torture? It is not -- that's why the words are spelled differently. To get to the heart of the difference, assume you were a prisoner at Abu Graib, and your interrogator started to remove your fingers one by one with bolt cutters. How long would it take you to beg to be posed with women's panties on your head? Yeah, I thought so.

This is not to excuse in any way the shameful behavior committed there by a few individuals who clearly are not fit to wear the uniform of the United States. They have disgraced us all and done incalculable damage. But if producing humiliation and fear is now to be defined as "torture," what international human rights organization will be appointed to help the surviving readers of The New York Times?


P-E-R-S-P-E-C-T-I-V-E.

As a side note, it's not a huge deal but helps to understand perhaps where Durbin comes from and why. There was a blurb on the Corner yesterday pointing out that Senator Durbin has not visited the base as a member of the various Congressional delegations who have in fact observed the detention facility. The conclusion of course being that the loudest of the squawkers have not yet set foot there. Also illuminating.

Deconstructing Downing Street

Tim Cavanaugh takes on the Downing Street Memo in Reason. and does a wonderful job of it!

I don't know if Sim has seen it, but I'm sure it makes (or will make) him smile...

Loud and Proud!

Phoenix has won the title of "Sweatiest City in America," for the second time. What an honor...

Phoenix has won the dubious title of "Sweatiest City in America," according to the good folks at Old Spice. This is the second time the city topped the deodorant company's list; it also owned the moniker in 2003.

The company made its determination by taking the average height and weight of U.S. men and women and comparing it with average temperatures last June, July and August. The sweat level was analyzed using an assumption that the individual was walking outside for an hour. Last summer, the average temperature was 104.8 degrees, enough to allow Phoenix to snag back the title from last year's winner, El Paso.

The only one likely to benefit from the survey is Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon, who will receive a year's supply of Old Spice Red Zone antiperspirant.

You knew it was coming

But it is still disappointing to see:

The family of 91-year-old W. Mark Felt, who revealed his role as The Washington Post's key Watergate source two weeks ago, has chosen PublicAffairs Books to publish a combination of autobiography and biography, publisher and CEO Peter Osnos said last night. Osnos said that Universal Pictures has optioned Felt's life story and the book for a movie to be developed by Hanks's production company, Playtone.

Follow up on Senator Blockbuster

I mentioned it yesterday and it's finding it's way into the media today. Arab media, that is. (Way to go Dick!)

This morning, Laura Ingraham interviewed Sgt. Major Steven Short (Ret). Sgt. Major Short prior to his retirement was serving as the senior NCO at Gauntanamo Bay. As such, he had months and months of first-hand observations to share.

Some of them included such things as we've heard recounted by others: three squares a day, culturally sensitive; a Koran and the opportunity to answer the 5 daily calls to prayer, etc. etc.

Alternatively, he offered a few things that we haven't heard before and that raised my eyebrow. The picture of religious tolerance becomes even clearer when you hear about cell markers for detainees, pointing them toward Mecca and informing them of their distance from it.

The other point catching me off guard was that, on average, during his time at Gitmo detainees gained roughly 13-pounds a man. Of course, three-squares a day will do that.

The broader picture--piecing the sergeant Major's observations together with what we've heard before--paints a picture of a level of care that is decent--not without faults, but then again it is a military prison--and a level above what we see elsewhere (if you're interested, remind yourself of how Jessica Lynch was treated after being taken prisoner).

As individual incidents have shown us, it is not all fun and frivolity. There have been times when enemy detainees have in fact been treated in ways that ought to shame. Also note, in the interest of fairness, how those situations have been treated.

In each case, from Abu Ghraib to Gitmo, incidents have been investigated and where merited perpetrators have been disciplined, reassigned and even punished. The single greatest evidence of that is Abu Ghraib; the US Army announced investigations into conduct there months before Mary Mapes got her hands on the pictures and well before Uncle Sy started building his torture narrative. Now ask yourself why...

People like Durbin who make comparisons that are confused in understanding of intent, size and scope not only slights the suffering that victims of the Soviet gulags, Pol Pot and the Holocaust endured, it leaves them no words with which to describe truly similar horrors. Worst of all, it exposes their own moral idiocy.

If you want to understand more about a real Gulag, click here.

If you want to learn more about the Khmer Rouge, click here.

Not that you should have to, but if you want to learn more about the Holocaust, click here.


P.S. To read what others are saying, check out OpinionJournal.com, Hugh Hewitt and Powerline.

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

'V' is for vacuous

It hurts my ears...

Listen to the Tonight Show performance at the first link if you dare. If you're not so brave, click the second and read the lyrics.

'V', no doubt, is for vacuous.

Somebody buy the man a gift card

Senator Dick Durbin needs to run down to Blockbuster and rent a movie or two...

Point, Counter-point

Monday
This was an above-the-fold story Monday. I didn't discuss it because I just didn't have the mental energy to bother with it, aside from making a mental note that it's the third such negative-life-as-we-know-it-is-about-to-end story to appear above the fold on the Republic's front page in as many days.

Tuesday
Rick in Surprise wasn't quite as ready to let it go. His letter to the editor today reads:

Regarding the headline Monday: "U.S. death toll tops 1,700":

Maybe tomorrow's headline could read: "U.S. death toll remains at 0."And the subhead could read: "Not one U.S. citizen has died from terrorist attacks on America's soil since Bush declared war on terrorism."

Wednesday
So much for that idea...

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Water it and it will grow

An unexpected sign of common sense at TPMCafe today:

But let’s slow down a little. Setting political calculus entirely aside, it’s no slam dunk that moving to a single-payer approach would be the best policy given the peculiarities – and genuine strengths – of our existing system.

Water the seedling and it may grow into a mature tree...

"Yes, that is what I have been saying all along!"

A great line from one of the lesser Pink Panther movies. I am no expert, but I do have the ability to make informed observations and I have been doing so vis-a-vis the housing market here in Phoenix.

For all the concern over the potential for a bursting-bubble here, the conditions are not quite right. There is still too much growing to do. The market, left to itself with no outside influences will continue to grow and housing prices will rise accordingly, if not somewhat faster because of outside investors.

I know this because I lived in Southern California for 30+ plus years. Some things are elementary and don't require 20 years industry-specific experience to understand. This is one of them.

Nice to see experts agree!

Some things you shouldn't have to say

Michael Jackson's lawyer said Tuesday the singer will no longer share his bed with young boys.


For the first time ever, I actually agree with Steve Benson.

The Planet of Sound

will be visited tonight beginning at 7pm at Jones Beach Amphitheater. I will be checking out one of my favorite bands, The Pixies, along with Interpol and LCD Soundsystem.

A little older, a little heavier, and except for bassist Kim Deal; a little balder, the Pixies are still heavy duty rockers of the first order. They were pretty much a mainstay on the soundtrack of my college years and even after they split up around 1994 they have remained in heavy rotation on my CD player. Over the years, surpisingly, I think I've grown to love and respect their music even more. For me, they are a terriffic blend of melodious pop hooks backed by superior rock musicianship.

This will be the fourth time I have seen them live (I should probably do a post on my career as concert attendee sometime). I first saw them opening up for U2 at Dallas' Reunion Arena on the Achtung Baby tour. My next glimpse of the band was later that same year in a small club in Dallas at which Ice-T and Bodycount opened up. Save for the time I saw Nirvana, that was the most off the hook concert I've ever attended. The last time I saw The Pixies was back in January here in NY at the Hammerstein Ballroom. They always put on a top notch performance, so I'm really looking forward to seeing them.

I also saw Interpol a few months ago at Radio City. In many respects, I find them to be something of a Joy Division rip-off, but it's actually OK since Joy Division isn't around anymore and someone needs to be making that kind of music. I was surprised to see how well they translated from album to concert stage and now I'll be interested to see how the whole thing works at an outdoor venue. As for LCD Soundsystem, I don't know much about them but I've heard they are really good.

It's also kind of a big evening on another front. I will be attending the concert with a woman whom I hadn't had the guts to ask out for about a year. So I finally summoned up my courage and invited her to the show (kind of a slam dunk, because I knew she liked The Pixies). She accepted and so this will be kind of a first date. After agreeing to go, she then proceeded to ask me out for a pre-emptive mini-date last Sunday, which was a lot of fun. So we'll see how it goes.

In any case, it should be a lot of fun and I will do a review tomorrow. Of the show, people. The show.

Et tu, Tim?

I hate fantasy baseball. You know that. No need to recount the reasons.

My master-plan for securing a second straight league championship has turned to well, you know. How did this happen?

Simple. I built that team around pitching and my pitchers can't. Randy Johnson would be more aptly named Randy Jekyll or Randy Hyde depending on which start you want to discuss.

Jason Schmidt? Don't get me started...In his last two starts, he's gone a total of 9 innings, giving up 12 earned runs for an ERA of 12 and a WHIP near 2. In fact, he's been so bad you've got at least one guy wondering out loud about just how healthy he is: "He's pitching like a guy that is hurt, though I can't definitively say that," says another scout who was in attendance. "It's one thing to have a velocity drop. But why are your mechanics affected? Why can't you throw strikes? Unless you're afraid. And he doesn't seem like a guy who would be afraid."

For most of the season Tim Hudson has been the only one of my top-line guys who has pitched anywhere near expectations. Apparently Tim has been sitting too close to Randy and/or Jason on my bench...

His June stats: 0-2, 7.90 ERA, and a 2.06 WHIP. Go back a little farther and you see that in his last 8 starts he is 3-4, has an ERA near 6 but a slightly better WHIP of 1.92, which is still nothing to write home about. In that stretch, he's walked as many as 5 three different times.

This team can't be fixed at this point. Initially I chalked it up to a bad start, especially when I only had 6 Wins in April. But it continues to get worse and there's no real help out there to be had. I'm officially in DCM (Don't Care Mode).

Defending Chumps

At the risk of sounding petty, I must say that I'm rather amused at where things stand in this year's NBA Finals through the first two games. After watching the Pistons dismantle a disfunctional but still-talented Lakers team like they were Prairie View A&M, I am firmly committed to rooting any and all failure(s) of the Motown Dozen.

So far, so good. Read the damage report here from the Game 2 debacle. And wonder out loud how the Pistons might manage to actually compete in tonight's game 3...

Downing Street: A Vast Left Wing Conspiracy

It seems that no one is making stronger arguments against the "Downing Street Memo(s) As Smoking Gun" notion these days than key liberals themselves. In this case, Michael Kinsley gets it absolutely right.

Although it is flattering to be thought personally responsible for allowing a proven war criminal to remain in office, in the end I don't buy the fuss. Nevertheless, I am enjoying it, as an encouraging sign of the left's revival. Developing a paranoid theory and promoting it to the very edge of national respectability takes ideological self-confidence. It takes a critical mass of citizens with extreme views and the time and energy to obsess about them. It takes a promotional infrastructure and the discipline to settle on a story line, disseminate it and stick to it. It takes, in short, what Hillary Clinton once called a vast conspiracy.

While Kinsley seems to be rejoicing that his guys are rallying around the flag on this one, he concedes that it's a rather silly flag to be rallying around. And unfortunately for the Democrats, such conspiracies always get exposed and their purveyors end up looking like interminable, partisan hacks. That Kinsley has a soft spot for those advancing this agenda should give you some sense for just how vacuous and desperate the Democrats have become.

But Kinsley nails the essential truth about the DSM: It's hardly a smoking gun. Not only is the memo based on third-hand information, unnamed participants and a word ("fixed") that is contextually open to about four different interpretations, it's not NEWS.

Of course, you don't need a secret memo to know this. Just look at what was in the newspapers on July 23, 2002, and the day before. Left-wing Los Angeles Times columnist Robert Scheer casually referred to the coming war as "much planned for." The New York Times reported Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's response to a story that "reported preliminary planning on ways the United States might attack Iraq to topple President Saddam Hussein." Rumsfeld effectively confirmed the report by announcing an investigation of the leak.A Wall Street Journal Op-Ed declared that "the drums of war beat louder." A dispatch from Turkey in the New York Times even used the same word, "inevitable," to describe the thinking in Ankara about the thinking in Washington about the decision "to topple President Saddam Hussein of Iraq by force."Then there's poor Time magazine (cover date July 22 but actually published a week earlier), which had the whole story. "Sometime last spring the President ordered the Pentagon and the CIA to come up with a new plan to invade Iraq and topple its leader." Originally planned for the fall, the war was put off until "at least early next year" (which is when, in fact, it occurred).

We knew in the summer of 2002 that the Administration was making war plans. We knew that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were anathema to going to the UN. We knew that prior to the breakdown of diplomacy at the UN that Halliburton and Bechtel had been granted contracts and been written into the war plans. Of course the new party line we will be hearing from the moving-target crowd is that the second Downing Street Memo, released over the weekend, reveals the British assessment that relatively little planning had been done by the Americans with regard to the war's aftermath. Of course, this appears to be true given the way things have gone since the fall of Baghdad. And with each death in Iraq, it is worthy of our outrage.

However, it is a fundamentally disingenuous position to scream "gotcha" when documents suggest that Bush had ordered planning, granted contracts and made decisions "too early" in the process, at the same time that you are arguing that "not enough" was being done on the planning front. It seems to me to be an intellectually untenable position. If you want to take the Bush Administration to task in an intellectually honest fashion, you have to pick one or the other.

My frustration with the Administration is not that they "lied" or "mislead" the public, it's that they were incompetent in creating the best possible conditions for success in Iraq. They didn't get it done on the diplomatic front to assure a UN blessing and encourage broader participation. They also developed a rather haphazard plan for securing the peace. As a result, we have seen the costs in blood and treasure spiral unnecessarily high. We have given fodder to our enemies and critics worldwide by providing them with untold hours of video depicting mangled, bloodied bodies of women and children, not to mention creating the conditions where an Abu Ghraib could even take place. We've emboldened the Iranians and Syrians to interfere with nascent political development in Iraq. And the list goes on. While a lot of the post-war planning did go right, too much has gone wrong. Unnecessarily. And for that, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, and yes, even Colin Powell, should be held accountable. Only time will tell whether Iraq will become a success story or be viewed as "another Vietnam." But even if the history books label it a success, it will be one achieved with unnecessarily high costs. Maybe if the Democrats quit trying to drag the "Smirking Chimp's" presidency down by making conspiratorial charges, and focused their efforts on the things that are obvious to us all, they might actually regain some relevance.

Monday, June 13, 2005

Where he would have gone...

The Michael Jackson verdict is in...not guilty on all 10 counts of the indictment. Yet another reason I am glad I no longer live in the ridiculous nightmare that is California. I weep for my home-state.

In the meantime, we can read up on MJ's likely destination had these 12 citizens of California had an ounce of critical thinking between them...

"Where is the outrage?"

Kirk in Mesa appears to agree with Gary in Chandler. Anger, anger, everywhere anger! The Liberal media-myth isn't true because if it were, Bush would be facing Articles of Impeachment in the House even today!

When the Watergate scandal was unfolding, our nation was justifiably outraged. We were justifiably outraged that the Nixon administration was involved in the burglary of the offices of their political opponents and the cover-up of this crime.

However, it seems to me that the Watergate scandal pales in comparison to the George W. Bush administration's lies to the American people and the world about the reason to attack and invade another sovereign nation.

Where is the outrage?

Where is the outrage that the so-called weapons of mass destruction had absolutely nothing to do with why the Bush administration wanted to invade Iraq? The Bush administration was not deceived about weapons of mass destruction: the Bush administration did the deceiving.

Where is the outrage that thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens and American soldiers are dead or crippled for life because of the lies of the Bush administration?

If I had to guess based on this short blurb, I'd say that Kirk went to bed one night in January, 1991 and in his best Rip Van Winkle imitation woke up last week. Read a book Kirk. Or two or three.

While Kirk--and others assuming they get a grasp on the facts and history--might be able to make a case that given what we knew and did not know about Saddam that invading wasn't a good idea, nobody is allowed to conveniently rewrite history and ignore the contribution of Saddam's deceipt to the intelligence failures of the Bush Administration.

Back to the drawing board

The mood at home can be summarized with one word: Frustration.

After a phone conversation over the weekend, even my wife's surgeon is now convinced that her GB was not and is not the sole cause of her medical concerns. This judgment coming after being informed of her situation as of 9:00 p.m. last night: severe nausea for most of the last 24 hours.

The next step? Priority scheduling with the group's Gastro-entorologist for this week to hunt for yet another diagnosis of the root cause of her symptoms.

GRRRRR! Isn't that why we agreed to surgery...?

  • Better Living: Thoughts from Mark Daniels
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • One Hand Clapping
  • Camp Katrina
  • TPMCafe
  • Dodger Thoughts
  • Boy of Summer
  • Irish Pennants
  • tabletalk
  • Fire McCain
  • My Sandmen
  • Galley Slaves
  • Michelle Malkin
  • myelectionanalysis
  • Iraq the Model
  • Mystery Pollster
  • A Bellandean! God, Country, Heritage
  • Right Truth
  • The Fourth Rail
  • Counterterrorism Blog
  • Just One Minute
  • Broken Masterpieces
  • Kudlow's Money Politic$
  • Econopundit
  • Tapscott's Copy Desk
  • The Blue State Conservatives
  • Palousitics
  • Christian Conservative
  • Outside the Beltway
  • The Belmont Club
  • Froggy Ruminations
  • The Captain's Journal
  • Argghh!!!
  • Chickenhawk Express
  • Confederate Yankee
  • Reasoned Audacity
  • Taking Notes
  • ThisDamnBlog
  • Three Knockdown Rule
  • Dogwood Pundit
  • Dumb Looks Still Free
  • Unfettered Blather
  • Cut to the Chase
  • Alabama Improper
  • Austin Bay Blog
  • Michael Yon-Online
  • The Trump Blog
  • A Lettor of Apology
  • GM Fastlane Blog


  • Powered by Blogger

    Listed on BlogShares Who Links Here