People in the Know #3
Hugh Hewitt credits this interview with author Robert Kaplan for moving him closer to an endorsement of the Port deal. In listening to it, I understand why.
Kaplan has a birds-eye view of the region because he's spent countless month's in the Persian Gulf, Africa, Afghanistan and Iraq since 9/11. Such colors his understanding of this deal and the region in general. He makes the case for why this deal is OK in a matter of minutes that the administration hasn't made in a week:
HH: Now with that background, does the control of the ports issue, the sale of these ports operations, not security, to United World Ports of Dubai, does it concern you?
RK: I mean, to the degree that the U.S. can still be in control of personnel working there, and security, I have no problem with Dubai's competence at running a port as well or better than we do. And it's part of the process of globalization, and at this point, if you tell them no, simply because they're Arabs, you're going to lose a lot more in the Arab world than you'd ever gain by a marginal improvement in security. And I think the security issue can probably be gotten around without tearing up the contract.
HH: What is that security issue in your mind, Robert Kaplan?
RK: It's about control of who the personnel are who have access to the port, and to the security procedures that govern the port, and have access to the people who control who goes in and out of the secure areas.
HH: So there is a security issue. You just view the cost of killing the deal as too high?
RK: Yes. Absolutely.
HH: Well, that's the argument the administration...
RK: If the security issue is manageable...
HH: Go ahead.
RK: The security issue is manageable, and the people...and there's very few countries in the world who've done as much so impressively as the Maktoum family in Dubai.
HH: Tell me a little bit about al Qaeda and Dubai. Is it there?
RK: Well, it has to be there, because it's an...Dubai has an open financial system, which is why it's so efficient in the first place. And one of the costs of having an open, free banking system in the heart of the Middle East, is you're going to have some bad apples.
HH: And do those bad apples pose a threat of penetrating Dubai World Ports, and that position?
RK: I don't think so. I don't think so, and the key thing here is that the Dubai government has always been totally helpful to us, in terms of penetrating those bad apples.
HH: I hope you'll write something about this, Robert Kaplan, on your return flight.
RK: Yes, also, something else. We have United Arab Emirates Special Forces in Afghanistan. It's called SOTF, a combined joint Special Operations Force in Afghanistan when I was there. The word combined was there, because there were other countries other than our own, including Laxia and the United Arab Emirates.
HH: When you get back, expect a phone call from the administration asking you to appear, because you just did in seven minutes a lot more than they have in seven days.
I'm there already and as I've pointed out, people in positions to know are saying there is no reason--least as much as has been portrayed by Congressional critics and others--that this deal can't happen. In fact, it should possibly happen only because of what we gain in continued cooperation from the U.A.E.
No comments:
Post a Comment