Friday, July 08, 2005

What was that about nuance?

In the Presidential campaign of last year, I seem to recall hearing routinely about how the left's policies and approach to the world were the anti-thesis of conservatives. Where conservatives took a simplistic, sledge-hammer approach to the GWOT, liberals and Democratic candidates had a much more intricate and complex understanding of what was necessary. In a word, their position was nuanced.

Fast forward to July, 2005 and we have this comment from Eric in Chandler:

I wonder: If George W. Bush and Tony Blair had pursued the real war on terror - the all-out pursuit of Osama bin Laden - with the same enthusiasm as the needless detour to Iraq, would the world be mourning the loss of life today in London?

Anti-American Islamic terror begins and ends with Osama Bin Laden. Now, what exactly was that about nuance?

No comments:

  • Better Living: Thoughts from Mark Daniels
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • One Hand Clapping
  • Camp Katrina
  • TPMCafe
  • Dodger Thoughts
  • Boy of Summer
  • Irish Pennants
  • tabletalk
  • Fire McCain
  • My Sandmen
  • Galley Slaves
  • Michelle Malkin
  • myelectionanalysis
  • Iraq the Model
  • Mystery Pollster
  • A Bellandean! God, Country, Heritage
  • Right Truth
  • The Fourth Rail
  • Counterterrorism Blog
  • Just One Minute
  • Broken Masterpieces
  • Kudlow's Money Politic$
  • Econopundit
  • Tapscott's Copy Desk
  • The Blue State Conservatives
  • Palousitics
  • Christian Conservative
  • Outside the Beltway
  • The Belmont Club
  • Froggy Ruminations
  • The Captain's Journal
  • Argghh!!!
  • Chickenhawk Express
  • Confederate Yankee
  • Reasoned Audacity
  • Taking Notes
  • ThisDamnBlog
  • Three Knockdown Rule
  • Dogwood Pundit
  • Dumb Looks Still Free
  • Unfettered Blather
  • Cut to the Chase
  • Alabama Improper
  • Austin Bay Blog
  • Michael Yon-Online
  • The Trump Blog
  • A Lettor of Apology
  • GM Fastlane Blog


  • Powered by Blogger

    Listed on BlogShares Who Links Here